Environmental assessment and valorisation OM1304A

LO1 lists and discusses the plots of evaluation K_W16
LO2 lists and discusses the main methods of evaluation and assessment K_W16
LO3 choses proper method of landscape evaluation K_U25 K_U03 K_U02 K_U01
LO4 determines the plots K_U25 K_U03 K_U02 K_U01
LO5 performes the assessment of the environment K_U25 K_U03 K_U02 K_U01
LO6 determines the usefulness of environmenta for varoius functions K_U25 K_U03 K_U02 K_U01
LO7 sets out the priorities for the task K_K04

Lecture
The written exam consists of questions verifying the following learning outcomes: the student is able to list and discuss plot types, student can list and discuss the method of evaluation and assessment of the environment. The assessment is done in following scale: 2,0-3,0-3,5-4,0-4,5-5,0. The grades depend on the quality of answers. Discussion and use of notes during the exam are forbidden.

Project
For grade E: in determining the plots student commits many mistakes, in the implementation of evaluation results student commits a lot of mistakes, student in a schematic way determines the suitability of land for different function, student cannot draw conclusions or properly interpret the results of environment, student erroneously identifies priorities for the task.

For grade C: when determining the plots student commits minor mistakes, in the implementation of evaluation results student commits minor errors, student can in the schematic way determines suitability of land for different functions, student can draw conclusions, but some incorrectly, student can interpret the results evaluation, but makes mistakes, student determines priorities for the task.

For grade A: student determines plots correctly, student properly implement the evaluation results, student can determines suitability of land for different functions, student can draw correct conclusions, student can interpret the results evaluation, student determines priorities for the task.

Additional rules
Some of the exercises will be done in class, some ended at home. For the three exercises there will be marks, four classes will be passed. For these 4 exercises will be one additional evaluation taking into account whether the exercise was done properly for the first time or needed some corrections. One assessment will be based on adherence to the deadlines. The final grade is an average of 5 marks. Exercises should have the front page with the title, author’s name, academic year, year and type of course (the version given by academic teacher). Exercise should be the first page with the title, artist name, the direction and the year of study and academic year (in which students get from the teacher). The accuracy of project, the correct title, legend, maps, etc. will affect the assessment of the exercise.

Attendance to the class is mandatory (in accordance with the Rules of Study). Absence from classes must be justified on the first class in which a student appears after an absence. Depending on the topic and the amount of justified absences the way of making up classes will be determined individually. The student is required to complete the content of the course on his/her own before coming to the first class after an absence.

Kistowski M., Korwel-Lejkowska B., Waloryzacja środowiska przyrodniczego w planowaniu przestrzennym. Problemy Ekologii Krajobrazu 19, 2007 Szyszko J., Ocena i wycena zasobów przyrodniczych. Wyd. SGGW, 2010
Bajerowski T. (red.), Ocena i wycena krajobrazu. Wyd. Educaterr, Olsztyn, 2007 Richling A., Metody szczegółowych badań geografii fizycznej. PWN, 1993 Ostaszewska K., Geografia krajobrazu. PWN, 2002 Pietrzak M. (red.), Geoekologiczne podstawy badania i planowania krajobrazu rekreacyjnego. Problemy Ekologii Krajobrazu 5, 1999 Loh J., Harmon D., A global index of biocultural diversity. Ecological Indicators 5, 231–241, 2005