Conducted in terms:
Winter Semester 2010/11
Winter Semester 2011/12
Winter Semester 2012/13

ECTS credits: 4

Language: Polish

Organized by: Faculty of Civil Engineering and Environmental Sciences

Designing objects of the landscape architecture AK3044

http://materialy.wb.pb.edu.pl/slawomirwojtkiewicz/

Standards and technical considerations of designing playgrounds, historical and contemporary examples of the implementation of playgrounds, local vision. Preparation of project development.

Term 2012Z:

Consistency of composition should result in the student's chosen theme of the playground being developed based on the slogan:
• Passing through
• Obstruction
• Labyrinth
• School
• Charade
• Illusion
The project can be used a number of measures supporting spatial solution composition: rhythm, accent, texture, symmetry, asymmetry, contrast, translation, diffusion material. The choice of form may include various features of the composition as follows:
First dynamism
Second monumentality
3rd openwork

In terms of technical regulations and in a manner to be aware of and correct use different building materials: wood, stone, plastic, etc.
viewing task, a project, a review of the work done

(in Polish) Rodzaj przedmiotu

(in Polish) Obowiązkowy

Course coordinators

Term 2010Z:

Monika Anderson

Term 2012Z:

Sławomir Wojtkiewicz

Term 2011Z:

Monika Anderson

Learning outcomes

familiar with the legal and ergonomic design of playgrounds
know the historical background and development of the recreational sports kojaży historical and contemporary projects
examines the development area (working on the map)
draw up a conceptual design playground
knows and makes the selection of building materials and items of equipment over vegetation
Presents the development of design in the form of clear graphical representations

Assessment criteria

specialist development - practical assessment

Bibliography

1) Beltzig G. ,Księga placów zabaw, Typoscript, Wrocław 2001; 2) Skibniewska H., Goryński A., Bożekowska D., Tereny otwarte w miejskim środowisku mieszkalnym, Arkady, Warszawa 1979; 3) Gawłowska A., Integracyjny ogród przedszkolny – schemat funkcjonowania i założenia programowe, Warszawski Oddział Towarzystwa Placów Zabaw, Warszawa 2000; 4) Kosmala M. ,Wymagania bezpieczeństwa zawarte w normach europejskich dotyczących wyposażenia placów zabaw, Warszawski Oddział Towarzystwa Placów Zabaw, Warszawa 2000; 5) Jarosiński S.,Terenowe urządzenia rekreacyjne dla dzieci, ZW CZSR, Warszawa 1977;

"1) Rosłon-Szeryńska E., Znaczenie roślinności w przestrzeni zabawowej dziecka, Warszawski Oddział Towarzystwa Placów Zabaw, Warszawa 2000; 2) Neufert E., Podręcznik Projektowania architektoniczno – budowlanego, Arkady 2003; 4) Böhm A., O budowie i synergii wnętrz urbanistycznych, Politechnika Krakowska, Kraków 1981; 5) Burry J., The new mathematics of architecture, Thames and Hudson, London 2010;
"

Notes

Term 2012Z:

The functional should appoint:
• age range of users and tailored to their playground space
• spaces and places control of children by their parents
• boundaries of the development in the form of fences and other technologies will ensure that the cleanliness and safety of area.
• Absolute safety and ergonomics of the space
Formal solution should meet safety regulations, technical and Polish standards.

Scope of Project Completion:
The project must be submitted to a maximum of two boards 100x70 (stiffened sleepers) made a lasting technology in black and white. The project is made by hand: ink, pencil, pencil crayon, watercolor, etc.
First land development - the scale of 1:50 or 1:100 with the legend
Second four views facade - scale 1:50
3rd section showing building solutions, scale 1:50
4th detail, scale 1:10
5th at least 2 perspectives playground
6th monochrome model playground, scale 1:100
The final grade will be affected by the assessment sub enclosure, interim and final evaluation of the project. Is evaluated: readability and functional correctness of the solutions, designed attractive composition, the playground program and graphical model. The project is made individually. Rating scale: 2-5